How do people react when asked to think logically, and you show them an uncomfortable pairing of facts or positions? Many people react badly. Consider: Continue reading Logic
Facebook is a social media platform.
Facebook proposed its own crypto-currency, the Libra.
Facebook often locks people out of their accounts, or suspends them indefinitely, for posting things they deem “problematic.”
Would that constitute theft if said locked-out user had any Libra crypto he couldn’t access? Or, as an alternative construction, would using Libra, even a small amount of it, force FB to play fair and not ever lock you out of your FB account (because presumably you need to log in to FB to actually use Libra).
Pointed to it from Vox Day’s blog, I just finished listening to Owen Benjamin’s description (show number 494) of the sit-com Seinfeld and how the laugh track destroyed our culture. Pretty deep stuff. But is it over the top? One thing that it brought to mind was how the Japanese military conditioned their soldiers.
It’s not a normal act to stick a blade into someone and be OK with it. So they’d tie up a prisoner (POW or civilian, made no difference to them), perhaps put them in a trench where they could not run away or retreat, and order a soldier to bayonet the victim to death. While he did that, his squad-mates would be standing around him, cheering him on, laughing, clapping, making a joke or game of it. They’d already done the same, or soon would be. It conditioned them to think it was normal, and fun, and it dehumanized the victim. But it was the cheering, laughing, and open mocking of the dead and dying while their mate butchered a man… or woman, or child… that made it such a powerful social pressure.
It was murder with a laugh track, and it was undeniably successful at its intended mission.
Yes, what Owen says is spot on. Not over the top. It’s psychos conditioning a whole generation. No wonder there are so many people today who need a shrink. Or, better yet, to purge their lives of screens.
Sometimes when someone “steals” your idea, it’s not all bad. Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery, etc. In that light, via an email from a very helpful reader, I hear of Steve Bannon – yes, the famous one – supporting something like my idea from Heretics.
A “gladiator school” of sorts. Not identical, of course, and the CBS writers get some of the normal things wrong that they always do when describing anything remotely right of left-wing, but some good ideas, too.
h/t to Portly Pirate
Hmmmmm… I seem to remember a discussion in one of my books about this. 🙂 Continue reading Draft
In the real world, people tend to be true to their nature. Good writing reflects that, and characters act in ways that are internally consistent and believable. You may or may not like the characters, but if the various players in the story each are true to their own worldview, education, upbringing, etc., they are believable. In much the same way, various actors on the world stage – politicians, bureaucratic organizations, lawyers, televangelists, etc. – all play sadly repetitious, if not completely predictable, parts. Continue reading Trump, guns, Parkland, Pavlov, and character(s)
What makes a good story? Why are some “classics” and others fun but ultimately “meh?”
It’s up. Doing Well. Over $23k and >350 backers at this point.
Interesting point is that by my quick count, John C. Wright is in the lead, Lawdog is in second, and I’m in third. not a straightforward “count names” because a number of posts mentioned more than one title in ranked order, or brief discussion of merits. Each has it strengths and weaknesses. In any case, I’m honored to be considered in the same group, even if in last place. In any case, contribute, chip in if you can, cast your vote, and bask in the glow in a good deed that will induce REEEEEE!
UPDATE: $32k, 478 backers.
UPDATE2: >$42k, 608 backers, a bit less than 48 hours to go.