No, I will not willingly submit to a medical experiment which failed every single previous attempt so badly they didn’t even bother with animal trials this time because they knew all the test animals would all die. Again. This is evil and wrong. One short summary of the situation is here. A more complete version is below.
The book “Diary of a Young Girl” by Anne Frank is often read and studied in school. I have gone through it and discussed it myself, here at this school, with a student. One of the discussion points that is a normal part of it is “how could the Nazis have done this, and how could everyone else have gone along with it?” There were the active Nazis who hunted people down and executed them; these monsters were relatively small in number. There many who simply went along with the persecutions and did nothing because it was safer in the short term; there were many of these fearful and pathetic sheep who would willing turn someone in for a pittance or a “good” mark in their file, just to get through the day. There were the persecuted who were on the run, simply trying to stay alive, guilty of little more than existing and having the wrong ideas or being the wrong “type of people.” And then there were the brave resisters, who saw the wrong, the evil, for what it was, and risked all the help hide, transport, and save the persecuted; of these there were few. It is asked of the student “which group would you be in? Why do you think so? Will you meekly try to stay alive one more day, go along with any demand or decree, or will you do the right thing and fight tyranny and evil?”
Well, now is your real-life “come-to-Jesus” moment where you learn the truth of which group you are in. Time to pick a team and fly the flag for all to see.
Governor Inslee’s mandate is clearly illegal, a power-grab obviously violating the letter of state and federal laws in some places and the spirit in far more. The Legislature has unlawfully abdicated its just power and duties of oversite, and Governor Inslee’s proclamations far exceed his authority under the state and federal constitution. The act of simply declaring an emergency doe not grant him unlimited power. His demands upon our persons goes against FDA and CDC research data and common sense. It violates the Nuremburg code requiring informed consent to medical experiments; that code came from the war-crime trials following WWII in which doctors, politicians, bureaucrats, media journalists, and others were executed, and the excuse “I was just following orders” was explicitly found to be a inadequate.
Inslee’s proclamation is one he made without authority to do so, and without due process of law with proper legislature involvement and debate. It is an imperial decree by a poorly advised politician whose whims change with the wind and the most recent political donation. When he says, “follow the science,” he means whatever paid shill for Big Pharma or powerful union lobbyist he talked to last. “The Science” in favor of his decision is, at best, contradictory and riddled with conflicts of interest. At worst it flatly contradicts him.
If this dictate requiring injections of even private employees with an experimental and toxic synthetic mRNA is allowed to stand and is enforced by private companies, you cannot doubt it will be extended, one group at a time, to everyone in the state. It will extend slowly (or quickly) to additional freedom-infringing measures including tracking, with further restrictions, repeated “booster” shots of God-only-know what, and greater penalties for non-compliance. If he can arbitrarily destroy someone’s livelihood and career just because he declares it is an emergency, like a king, if they do not accept being part of a medical experiment that has already killed tens of thousands worldwide and caused hundreds of thousands of serious adverse reactions just in America, then where do you draw the line? Where will you say “this far and no farther?” Upon what principle will you stand? If you can demand employees assume all risk of participating in this medical experimental #StrokePoke as a condition of employment, you are declaring your side.
Are you aware this “vaccine” (really a gene therapy) has not only never passed animal trials, it was never even subjected to them? Humans are the lab animals this time. Are you aware that there has never been a successful coronavirus vaccine of any type, even though they have been trying for longer than I’ve been alive? All the animals they tested, died. Every time. Are you aware that there has never been a successful mRNA-type vaccine of any type, even though they have been trying for more than 20 years? All the animals they tested, died. Every time. Are you aware the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology is warning people against using it? And now we are expected to believe that in less than a year they solved all those problems in both and came up with several “safe and effective” versions? Are you aware that as of this writing, more than half of all vaccine deaths in the VAERS system, established three decades ago to track vaccine adverse reactions, have occurred with the Covid19 experimental vaccines? As of this writing, it’s more than 13,900 dead, and 56,000 sent to the hospital. Are you going to enforce coming semi-annual booster shots, even if you see them sickening people?
Are you aware these medical products were researched or produced in cell lines harvested from aborted fetal tissue? Are you aware that part of the reason that the medical industry is so strongly supportive of all “women’s right to choose” is to allow them access to a steady stream of fetal tissue and organs for research, the more fully developed the better? Do you want to go along with all of us being required to support that harvesting with our tax dollars to buy billions’ of dollars worth of the experimental medial products from the companies that are doing this research, using those nearly-fully-developed harvested organs? Tissues that would have been a healthy infant in perhaps as soon as a few days?
Are you willing to sign a statement assuming full financial liability for any and all side- effects of taking the investigational vaccine? Or are you requiring your employees take on the full burden of the possibility of permanent disability or death for a barely-better than minimum wage job with virtually no meaningful benefits for hourly teachers? Have you considered all of the questions on this page https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections/ ?
Are you aware that while the vaccine makers and the federal government are legally shielded from liability for harm from the experimental vaccines, other private companies demanding their use are not, even if they are “following mandates?”
Are you aware that these vaccine can (not always do, but can) rewrite DNA?
( https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/03/16/mit-harvard-study-suggests-mrna-vaccine-might-permanently-alter-dna-after-all ) For a man of faith, made in God’s image, that’s sort of like rewriting the Bible, because God’s design (your immune system) isn’t good enough. At the same time, this is a manufactured biological product; did you know there is an “acceptable level” of “leftover DNA and tissue” from the mRNA manufacturing process still in the not-vaxx they inject you with? There are a number of problems with it. ( https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf ) So you are asking us to not only potentially modify our DNA to produce toxic spikes, but to inject remains of what might have become a child in your own school? It’s just a vaccine, you say.
Are you aware that the Pfizer “vaccine” is not actually FDA approved, and will still be undergoing the testing phase at least until 2023? There are two aspects to this fact:
(1) Bait and switch: Pfizer and the FDA put out two letters the same day, one noting an extension of the current Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the continued use of existing stocks of experimental products, for which the product inserts are blank and the vials may vary lot-to-lot as they tweak ingredients and dose (yes, they have been experimenting on humans). The other is for the officially approved product, “Comirnaty,” which lists the ingredients online but isn’t actually available yet; it’s reserved until all existing stocks are used up (by which time the strain it is supposed to protect against will be long gone). It’s a legal bait-and-switch. Just one story of several about it is given here for more details. They simply assert that the active ingredients are substantially the same. But if you look at the VAERS data, it indicates a tiny fraction of a percent of the lots accounted for over half of all hospitalizations and deaths. Some experimental formulations are more successful than others. Are you supporting a demand that all your employees spin the Russian Roulette vaccine wheel and hope they don’t get a bad batch?
(2) Fraud- In order for the FDA to “approve” them they had to violate their own guidelines and regulations as well as federal law simply by declaring some requirements as being met, meaning it would be a fraudulent approval under color of law, and according to Throckmorton, “fraud vitiates all things.”(UNITED STATES v. THROCKMORTON, 1878, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61 ). The acting head of the FDA is a political hack who was brought in to approve it and leave, much as she did years ago with Oxycontin and Fentanyl. Some regulators have major conflicts of interest, and their following of the letter and spirit of the law is less than scrupulous. The federal government legal immunity does not extend to private enforcers of illegal demands.
Are you aware of the fact there are effective treatments for Covid? (for example https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ and https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/zelenko-prophylaxis-protocol/ and https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/aaps-Guide-to-Home-Based-Covid-Treatment.pdf ) Those would invalidate the EUA were they officially recognized. This means the original EUA and emergency declaration is fraudulent, or at least entirely unnecessary. There is no valid reason to justify the risk this “vaccine” presents. Perhaps the fact that Fauci has his name on some of the relevant (highly profitable) patents involved might explain it. ( http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/a-manufactured-illusion-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich-9721/ ). Why would they disallow cheap and effective treatments? Because Pharma makes money on sick people, and can’t make billions on cheap and effective generic drugs which are safe and out of patent, taken on an out-patient basis. Ivermectin and HCQ are OTC in most of the world, and both are astonishingly safe.
Federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the “option to accept or refuse administration” of the Covid-19 vaccine. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3 ) This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine that is actually available, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must “be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision” for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).
I have a page that I have created to track problems and potential problems and research about covid and treatments for it here: https://www.thestarscameback.com/plague/ .
No honest person can peruse that and think this experimental mRNA monstrosity is safe, or effective. The only real question is how many millions it will kill before the experiment is over? What sort of people push something they KNOW is dangerous?
I am sure you are aware the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees’ medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their medical status, as the many AIDS related cases of decades ago fully attest. The fact that some tin-pot tyrant told you to do it does not absolve you of moral or legal responsibility. Or, to put it more legalistically:
Demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. (https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-enforcement-guidance-disability-related-inquiries-and-medical). An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with a reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires that the employee’s medical status cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any another means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at the prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness, and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages and fines.
When you additionally consider that because you operate several small facilities and a reasonable accommodation would be to move all unvaccinated employees and students in an area to one of those facilities which would provide sufficient isolation, an alternative to requiring an intrusive, risky, and potentially dangerous medical procedure which cannot be undone at the end of employment is not reasonable. Or, if the numbers are smaller, move them into one wing or set of adjacent classrooms away from others. Separation from the rest of the staff or students in 1-on-1 classrooms is easy.
International law, Constitutional law, specific statutes, and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possibly suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment. Again, if you are unsure of the safety or alternatives of these “vaccines,” please look through my “plague page” given above. More than 50,000 officially recognized dead bodies in the various official vaccine adverse reaction registration systems around the world indicate otherwise. It took only 53 adverse reaction deaths to pull the Swine Flu vaccine in 1976.
Consider the “problem” being “solved” by vaccination mandates. The previously infected are better protected than the vaccinated (which the data linked to on my Plague Page supports in several places), so why are they not exempted? Too, they are at higher risk for bad reactions than people who have not been exposed. Equally, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the face-to-face employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, and scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is “very rare.” Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Vaccinated can carry and spread vastly higher viral loads than the unvaccinated (up to 251 times as high). Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer’s decision making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. The fact that you are “just following a mandate” (which is unjustified, unreasonable, ineffective, and arbitrary) doesn’t mitigate your decision in how to enforce it.
Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear “no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/141/250) Even were I to get a medical or religious exemption today, I would expect if Governor Inslee gets an “acceptable” compliance rate he’s just narrow the exemptions and up the medical harassment of healthy people tomorrow, likely making them subjected to a routine humiliation ritual of regular nasopharyngeal swab testing when healthy by someone who isn’t trained and might even take joy in inflicting bodily indignity and pain with an unreliable test that may cause physical damage if done improperly.
As any competent psychologist knows, appeasing a bully simply feeds their desire for power and control, and they will demand more, always more. If you do not stand up to the illegal diktats of the Perfumed Princes of Olympia now, then when? For what? Whether you are generally pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, this is about an illegal mandate to take an irreversible experimental “medicine” as a condition of continued employment. Fighting this isn’t just about the law. The soul of the nation’s freedom to choose to keep basic bodily integrity is at risk. “My body my choice” women have said for a generation. Well, now… your soul is on the line; stand with the tyrant, or against? Now is the time to declare your side and fly your flag.
I will not take the #ClotShot. This is an experiment in population control and manipulation that has no end-point, except the point at which we stop complying or die. You do not need to be a genius to see it, you merely have to see the ever-moving goal-posts as we enter the 18th month of “two weeks to flatten the curve.” I will not be treated like a second-class citizen and medical test subject when I am healthy because I will not kneel with enough deference. I will not resign. Where do your actions, first asking about our status, and then requiring an irreversible action be take or you will end our careers, put us on this progression of events originally created by the WII Holocaust Museum?
This insane, crazed push to vaccinate everyone, even those at extremely low risk, with a clearly failing product that looks so much like demonic possession in its complete disconnect from reality and cruel psychological manipulation and demand for submission that has led me to stop just reading the Bible but start going to church regularly as well. This evil is unlike anything I’ve ever seen; I’ve only read about it.
At its core, this debate is not complex. You either believe that the government has full control over what you and I put in our bodies and your children’s bodies, or we do. It’s about medical tyranny by evil men with private companies being the enforcement arm of the arbitrary and capricious decisions of a politician who may be different next year, versus medical rationality and the right to choose bodily integrity. Blind obedience with any arbitrary order no matter how absurd, or “Irish Democracy” and getting on with life.
In the face of evil, “go along to get along” isn’t an option.
I, for one, will not kneel to evil.
=-=-=
Christians believe humans are made in God’s image; the body is sacrosanct and is not to be used or desecrated in improper ways. Convincing young women to end innocent life for personal convenience so that harvesting and using aborted fetuses for corporate profits is enabling and encouraging murder-by-proxy.
1) Most of the experimental (and the only approved) Covid19 vaccine products were researched and created using aborted fetal tissue, and have “allowable contamination” quantities which may still be present and injected with the active material, which is abhorrent.
2) Humans are created in God’s image, and for each of us that plan is written into our DNA, each of us being a unique creation. This mRNA product can sometimes alter the DNA of the recipient. I do not even eat GMO foods, and it would be a corruption of God’s design to allow even the potential to edit that code of life in my body to produce toxic spikes. This is a new and unique risk, with no historic parallel in vaccines or other medications.( https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/03/16/mit-harvard-study-suggests-mrna-vaccine-might-permanently-alter-dna-after-all )
4) If a new vaccine that cannot possibly modify the the recipient’s DNA, and is not researched and created and produced using aborted fetal tissues, contains no aborted fetal tissues, and is fully tested for safety and efficacy and properly approved, then I would be happy to reconsider my religious objection at that time. As there are a number of other as-yet-unapproved vaccines in development, this is a possibility.